Tuesday 19 April 2011

Top 10 Overlooked Acting Performances: Part 2

[MORE SPOILERS]

5. Jim Carrey in The Truman Show

Peter Weir's devlishly charming satire The Truman Show in 1998 came at the peak of rubber faced comedian Jim Carrey's transition from broad comedy into more serious efforts, released between the very black The Cable Guy and the underappreciated biopic Man on the Moon, and is perhaps his best overall performance.

Playing a man who has grown up on a TV set, surrounded by actors his whole life without ever knowing, Truman extolls an old fashioned, wholesome approach to life that comes from the overly sweet, 50's like culture of Sea Haven.

But that all comes crumbling down as he begins to discover the conspiracy of lies, and he starts a fight to escape from all he has ever known.

The result is that Carrey really bears his soul as the tortured, confused and heartbroken yet determined Truman, trying to get through it all with a smile on his face despite being exposed to a different, terrifying world. The empathy he generates is staggering, culminating in the show's creator Ed Harris's desperate gambit to break his escape attempt using the ocean surrounding the fake environment. Deep down you, like the TV audiences in the film, are screaming at him to carry on despite all the risks.

Not only was it proven that Carrey can act, but also that he can lead a film of very high distinction.


4. Angus Macfadyen in Braveheart

Naturally when Braveheart was released to fanfare, there were much criticisms of the film's 'history'.

After all, we saw a Battle of Stirling Bridge with no bridge, William Wallace adapted from nobleman and mercenary to peasant and a non existant love affair with a genuine historical figure who was three years old when big Willy died.

But the biggest complaint was the portrayal of another national hero, Robert the Bruce. Certainly, he is not always shown in a sympathetic light, betraying Wallace at Falkirk and seemingly under the thumb of his leper father.

However, this does a disservice to the best performance of the piece. While Mel Gibson does enough to lead, hardly groundbreaking as a clean shaven Wallace but far from disgraceful, MacFadyen delivers in a crucial role with so much emotional content he's practically the fulcrum of somebody else's film.

He is a man caught between idealism and pragmatism, desperate to be a champion to his people but held back by a reluctance to lose his own power and that of his family, in a position to make or break Wallace's Herculean efforts. When he finally sides with the English, along with the other treasonous lords, he is beset by regret and loss, openly weeping at his own mistake.

As a character, he reaches the end of his arc by taking up Wallace's fight and leading the men as he did at Bannockburn and ultimately securing victory. In many ways, despite being a subplot, the Bruce is given a character study in entirety, and Macfadyen brings an intesity and raw edge absolutely essential.


3. Bruce Willis in Twelve Monkeys

Bruce Willis exists in that Hollywood middleground where it's generally accepted not much acting will be required, and as a result plaudits will be reserved but criticisms will not be forthcoming. The action star.

Willis was chosen by Terry Gilliam for the mind mending, time travel thriller Twelve Monkeys, on the strength of his adlibbed bathroom phone confessional in Die Hard. Furthermore, Willis drops all his trademark touches (the smirk, the angled head, etc) and shows no leading man reserve as the always confused, often drugged up and ultimately tragic James Cole, a man left with no childhood when all but 1% of the population are wiped out by a virus.

The result is a highly complex character and superbly fleshed out acting job, with Cole questioning of his environment, occasionally childlike in his curiosity and always out of place. As he flits between dedication to his mission and lack of conviction over what is real, Cole ends up following a destiny he had always witnessed.

Like the best actors, Willis disappears into the role, easily his best, and perhaps due to the understated nature of his character, he lost much of the spotline to the Oscar nominated Brad Pitt, who's own bizzare characterisation is worthy of individual praise.


2. Guy Pearce in LA Confidential

Picking out the best performance in the superlative LA Confidential is a little like asking which is the most important leg on a chair. It's an ensemble piece, not a single misplaced line or nuance, and for the most part nobody upstages anyone else. That only one actor was offically recognised by the Academy, Kim Basinger, is in itself something of a travesty.

The crime thriller strengthened the reputation of Kevin Spacey, reignited that of Basinger, redefined James Cromwell to audiences and ultimately was the big break for Antipodean duo Russell Crowe and Guy Pearce.

And while Crowe, excellent here, went on to Oscar glory, superstardom and controversy, Pearce has slowly built up a solid, respectable and never questionable career mostly out of the spotlight which has made him more of a cult favourite than a bone-fide big name.

This is reflected by the film, where Pearce takes on the subtlety of a highly unsympathetic, cold and ambitious Ed Exley, a cop with more interest in his career than being respected by his peers. However, despite earning glory in a case, he is forced to tear up his own success by the urge to seek the truth.

In a sense, he is the perfect anti-hero antidote to Crowe's more self-righteous, crude and blunt Bud White, creating the most unlikely team which begins with mutual hatred and concludes with grudging respect and natural camaraderie. The likeability comes from Pearce's projection of feeling in a very quiet manner, best demonstrated by his masterclass in reaction to his Captain, upon the mention of the peripheral Rollo Tomassi. On paper, you shouldn't like Exley, but you end up routing for his dangerous quest. It's the same natural approach which won over so many in the brilliant Mememto, another Pearce masterstroke.


1. Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now

It seems odd to choose as the ultimate a performance from a film so highly regarded and celebrated, and in my own humble opinion the best of all time.

But in many ways the choice can be reflected perfectly by the billing of the film's stars, evident on any poster, DVD cover or cast listing you come across. Marlon Brando, Robert Duvall....and then Sheen. While Brando created legend with his hugely unorthodox and totally appropriate virtuoso turn as the God like figure of Kurtz, and Duvall bagged an Oscar and a million soundbites as the manic, near insane Kilgore, both roles are basically extended cameos.

The film, and the crazed journey into the Heart of Darkness via fictional river Nung, is both carried and perfectly symbolised by the highly complex, much tortured and morally bankrupt anti-hero Captain Willard. It's his voyage, his tale and should really be seen as Sheen's film.

With Harvey Kietel having been ditched due to an overload of energy in his style, and Francis Ford Coppola ransacking Hollywood searching for his leading man, eventually Badlands star Sheen was chosen on the strength of, yet again, quiet and brooding intensity befitting a man always on his own edge.

Much of his dialogue comes from internal musings as he passes time on the boat reading over Kurtz's file, slowly understanding the man and increasing his personal desire to confront him. These form the moral centre of the story, and Willard's persona as a loner troubled by his own demons is perfectly incapulated by Sheen, who does so much more with a lingering look than a cutting line ever could.

This style, grounding the character, also proves the perfect straight man foil which brings out the best in Brando, Duvall and Frederic Forrest. The singularity of purpose ultimately makes Apocalypse Now what it is, both pragmatically and artistically, and by exploiting the central character as a witness to events we ourselves perfectly obeserve the madness and disparity surrounding Willard and fully understand his own motives and ultimate intention. A genuine masterclass.


Honourable Mentions


Joaquin Phoenix in Gladiator

Kelly MacDonald in No Country For Old Men

John Savage in The Deer Hunter

Carrie-Anne Moss in Memento

Al Pacino in Sea of Love

Cillian Murphy in The Wind That Shakes the Barley

Monday 18 April 2011

Top 10 Overlooked Acting Performances: Part 1

[SPOILERS TO THE HILT]

It's the classic story, really. You get your script, your director, your crew, your big star...and the rest is forgotten in the blink of an eye. Never mind the little people, the sorties, the technicals....and the actors who actually deliver a masterstroke you miss.

Or perhaps the other classic story. Lead actor comes good, but nobody expects or wants it. Either way, a film's nature or build can eclipse the truly wonderful work going on in front of it. I've picked out ten performances that deserve some real due despite being either overshadowed or dismissed by soundbite at the sound of.

10. Sylvester Stallone in Cop Land


In 1996 a little known police crime thriller came out and moderately amused the critics who said they liked the idea. Sure, it had a decent script, good director and excellent premise. Not to mention a supporting cast that included Robert De Niro, Harvey Kietel and Ray Liotta. But it also had Stallone as the lead, so it could never be accepted.

What did Stallone do for this role, after all? He was the figurehead of a half dozen Rocky's and a bunch of Rambo's. What does he know about acting?
Well, in fact he put on weight, dropped his action man stances and played to a tee a half deaf, naive sheriff who is brushed off by being posted to a village lived in by real NYPD cops, who befriend but never respect him.
But, being who he is, he obviously tried hard but failed to carry the picture? After all, he's since stated he regrets doing the film.

No. Stallone demonstrates the skill and passion he showed in the first Rocky (which he wrote) back in 79, throwing himself into a slightly pathetic character with good intentions but easily swayed, until it matters. It sounds like the classic drunk Sheriff in the old Westerns, but he manages to mutate his amiability so you route for Freddy Heflin, not Sly, and end up despising the ovetures of Harvey and his pack.

It's easy to say this is just Stallone acting, nothing more, but he's bloody good at it too. His conversation with Annabella Sciorra about marriage is in itself a demonstration of the Stallion's chops.

More than an action hero? Perhaps not. Capable of more? Absolutely. When Stallone regretted Cop Land, it wasn't because he was bad. It was because he didn't sell. Depressing alot?

9. Tom Cruise in Valkyrie


In 2008, the Razzers, aka The Golden Raspberry awards, handed crazy scientologist Tom Cruise a nomination for worst actor for an apparently self riteous film, and we all laughed. At this point, one time Golden Boy was at his most crazy with his religion and stuff!

After all, despite it being over twenty years since his big break, he couldn't act because of his religion, and on top of that he was in a self-riteous film and all was terrible and worthy of scorn...

Once again, I side with the underdog due to evidence. I reserve my personal opinion of Cruise and Scientology, because I judge an actor on his peformance. And if we are to trust the Razzies, just remember they handed a Worst Director nom to Kubrick for The Shining. That's self explanatory.

In a film where an ensemble cast bare their best, Cruise proves that he isn't just the Hollywood leading man. He tops an unfashionable film and delivers a silent intergrity, an unspoken confidence true of a man like Von Stauffenberg, Teutonic by descent and honourable by nature.

Whereas in Magnolia, his best performance, he is loud and arrogant, here his greatest moments are quiet ones, building the legacy on screen of a real life man who deserves massive respect. Over the top off screen he may be, but on it he is still a performer who can hit the mark. And in this case, more so than expected.

8. Gabriel Byrne in End of Days

For all we love the Terminators and Predators, we all secretly acknowledge that Schwarzenegger will be little good. Which sometimes is a shame.

After all, Total Recall raised ambiguity, and James Caan showed up in one of the crappiest nineties actioners. But by far the worst crime is against Gabriel Byrne, best known to audiences as Dean Keaton in The Usual Suspects. A serious, intense, versatile and talented actor, Byrne's main claim is Bryan Singer's spawn of brilliance and some Daniel Day-Lewis filn.

In End of Days, a proper horror flick until Arnie became involved, there's an intriguing story of Satan's urge to procreate and corruption within the church, and the millenium and blah blah blah. Point is, a vaguely intresting premise led by a Hollywood actioner looking old.

The one silver lining is Byrne, who delivers possibly the most authentic devil in film history. He's dark, charming and ruthless and also talkative, seemingly reasoning and very nearly sympathetic.

For an actor to play the part of evil incarnate and somehow encourage routing, victory is insured. Plus he looks the part.

7. Aaron Eckhart in The Dark Knight

When you consider The Dark Knight, you think of Heath Ledger's Joker, and the coughy Christian Bale's performance. But at the heart, serving the whole point is an honest but vulnerable D.A, Harvey Dent.

While Tim Burton's Batman showed the politician, and Batman Forever the recast end results, The Dark Knight charts his downfall from excellent, smart and motivated power man to revenge seeker, injured and with two faces, feeding off his pain, both physical and emotional as a result of his lover's death.

While the accolades and attention went elsewhere, Eckhart delivers a superb transfortmation, going from likeable lawman to angry justice seeker in natural seamlesness.

Even in the end scene, with Harvey placed as the ultimate evil, you still sympathise with his human turned chaotic plight, and the foreshadowed Roman tragedy piece is best represented by his anguish at the failure of his efforts and the corruption of those he took on. It's a truly heartbreaking conclusion.


6. Brad Pitt in Se7en


It's hard to imagine Brad Pitt as anything other than a hearthrob (hence the awful movies) but at one point he was a serious actor, delivering very serious matter in Twelve Monkeys and A River Runs Through It, and comedic stuff in True Romance and An Interview with a Vampire. And he actually got an Oscar nom during this phase (more on that later...).

In 1995 he starred in a distasteful masterpiece named Seven, or Se7en, where he understood an amazing project, to the point where he fought to maintain the vision of Fincher and writer Andrew Kevin Walker, threatening to quit if a happy ending was slapped on.

He plays a cocky, ignorant but also idealistic newcomer detective in the film, willing to challenge the older and long suffering Morgan Freeman. And he hits each mark to the key you want for.
Arrogant? Yes. Ignorant? A little. The transition? Absolutely.
And Pitt played an unsympathetic character right down to the labels, an attempted miltant next generation in control and with empathy by his side, feeding off his emotions and occasionally displaying an immaturity not befitting his skills as a detective.

But ultimately he is an idealist in a far from ideal world, with views that will be altered by real and offical exchange. But he's the perfect foil for Somerset's cynical outlook.